I know hardly anyone raises an eyebrow when faced with the phrase "circus of American politics," perhaps partly because of the tacit notion that, yes, it's a little goofy, but, still, "circus" overstates the case. If "circus" was inflated, we see now the danger, for with Donald Trump having shot to the top of the Republican field it's a challenge to find an appropriately hot cliche to describe the scene. Before it was a "circus." What is it now?
And what kind of sorting activity occurs in the lizard mind of a Republican primary voter when The Donald assails Mexicans and then proceeds to impugn the war record of John McCain?
The front-runner also appears oddly obsessed with the intellectual qualifications of his antagonists. He points out that McCain, in addition to allowing himself to be captured after being shot down over hostile territory, graduated last in his class at Annapolis. Lindsey Graham, he says, is not very smart, either. And Rick Perry's eyewear is an obvious attempt to look like something he isn't--namely, intelligent. Somehow, Trump seems to have overlooked the fact that Scott Walker did not make it through college.
We are told that The Donald will flame out. Probably this is true. It's hard to imagine Iowa "values-voters" falling under his spell, even if they don't like Mexicans as much as he doesn't like Mexicans. Here is Trump, speaking the language of faith to CNN:
"People are so shocked when they find out I am Protestant. I am Presbyterian. And I go to church and I love God and I love my church."
[Snip]
Trump said that while he hasn't asked God for forgiveness, he does participate in Holy Communion.
"When I drink my little wine -- which is about the only wine I drink -- and have my little cracker, I guess that is a form of asking for forgiveness, and I do that as often as possible because I feel cleansed," he said.
His God, his church, and soldiers who weren't captured all kissed by Trumpean love. The Mexicans, however, are another story. It seems a long time ago when, having suffered their fourth defeat (or fifth, depending on how you count) in the last six presidential elections, a panel of earnest Republicans looked into the matter and concluded that the party had to make itself more attractive to the younger, browner people of the country. And this is how they do it? It seems likely that many younger and browner voters took note of how long it took a pack of Republicans to condemn Trump for smearing Mexicans, compared to how long it took the same pack to condemn Trump for smearing McCain.
The Republicans have a problem. The answer to the question "What should the party do?" (tone down the wild talk, make nice to growing demographic groups) is incompatible with the answer to the question "What should an ambitious Republican politician do?" (compete with all the other ambitious Republican candidates for the votes of the wackos who make a majority of the electorate in a Republican primary).
That there are a zillion wackos is attested to by Trump's sudden assent in the polls soon as he started talking crazy.