The conservative magazine National Review uses its Twitter feed to plug recently published articles. The first tweet above supplies a link to an article criticizing Harvard for withdrawing a speaking invitation from someone with whom National Review agrees. The second tweet supplies a link to a story criticizing Georgetown Law School for failing to withdraw a speaking invitation from someone with whom National Review disagrees. Since these are back-to-back tweets, a few Communists think they demonstrate a degree of almost comical flexibility on the part of National Review, but what these leftists will never comprehend is that the views of National Review editors are recommended by reason while the views of its critics are beyond the pale of civilized discourse and must be suppressed or, if you prefer, cancelled.
They'd explain it themselves if they weren't working up an editorial on why France needs the electoral college.
Comments